Dirty Andys Posterous

 

Launch 48 - The Final Presentations

The Final Presentations – the final part in my War and Peace review of the Launch48 weekend. Parts 1, 2 and 3 hidden here, here and here.

I said in my first post that I am not one to sugar coat things and I’m not going to start here. Please don’t take anything too personally – I admire everyone for turning up and achieving something over the weekend, but....well I’ll cover the but in a minute.

So the final presentations started around 4.30 and went through to just after 6. Some teams just had one member stand up, some had a couple on stage, some managed four or five as they presented different parts. Considering that most of the presenters don’t exactly spend all their days doing this sort of thing the quality of the presentations was fantastic. They had microphones, but everyone spoke well, everyone seemed fairly confident, added a bit of humour and I think introduced their product satisfactorily. Andrew Dancy was the revelation of the event. When he pitched on Friday night he was a small nerdy guy who bought a sense of humour to a pretty boring product. Come Sunday night he was 10 feet tall and had everyone laughing. On Friday night all the girls wished Fabio was going to be in a team, by Sunday night they all wished they'd been in Andrew's team.

Before the next event I would suggest that everyone reads one or two articles on powerpoint presentations (or whatever tech you use). Complicated graphs and tables full of figures work for board meetings (sometimes) but not for presentations in this environment. Some of the slide decks had way too much information (our team included). There are various rules around, 7 lines of 7 words, minimum 28pt font etc – learn a few and use them next time.

There were no winners or losers, there was a write up on Techcrunch which Mike Butcher managed to push onto the main .com site which was a nice reward for all the hard work and hopefully demonstrated to the rest of the world that London and Europe can hold these sorts of events too – you don’t have to be in the Valley or Seattle.

So onto my review of the sites – don’t read this if you don’t want a big dose of honesty. I’ve done them in order of the Techcrunch article. I’m going to say this here because it applies to 4 out of the 6 – I was really disappointed with how far they had got with their product. During Launch48 everyone had a lot of energy. If you end with a somewhat marketable product then you can probably maintain that momentum, make a few tweaks and deliver a “Minimum Viable Product”(Google Eric Ries for more info). By failing to deliver anything close to a real working product I think teams have severely limited their chance of future success and probably reduced how good they feel about the whole event. Also I am quite aware that not all teams had access to designers – I’m certainly capable of looking past the design.

Wraply – Mike Butcher slated this product on Techcrunch. I feel perhaps they ignored the fact that there were new people in the room and didn’t tell the whole story – instead  carrying on from what was said on Friday night. Personally I think this product has a chance of success. There are products like this in the US and I see no reason why we couldn’t have one in the UK. I don’t think Amazon etc are competitors, it is not a wishlist product in that way. I do wish they had taken on my idea of targeting parents of school kids, at my daughters school we all get in together for each kid – 20 x 5 quid = £100 quid, which results in a much better present and a whole lot less wrapping paper.  But overall this was the first product where I was disappointed with the amount they had achieved. It did some basic things but looked VERY “prototypy”.  I really would have thought it would be easy to get this out in a weekend.  I believe Steve the ideas man does not live in London and with the state this was in I will be interested if they can make it happen without being able to get everyone together a couple more times – I see on Twitter that they are trying. I hope they do as I feel there is a market – although I doubt it will make anyone rich.

Grapeshots – I love wine (drinking a 94 Californian Cab Sauv as I type this) and this idea was similar to my beer idea, but I could never get behind it. Unfortunately I believe they ended up with a very small team which is a bit unfortunate. I think there is a market for people who want to find the wine they have just drunk, unfortunately I just don’t think the product will ever work – too many wines in the market. I was also quite surprised at the lack of development on the site, but they did have a very small team. I’m amazed that Mike Butcher liked the product, hopefully he will also like www.realalefinder.com which I will pitch at the next Launch48. The inside word is the team had a great time (maybe they spent too much time on product research..hiccup) and probably won’t be taking the product any further. I think that is probably for the best.

iRaceU-I think they had to change their name because of possible legal issues. New name is OK. If I was ranking things in a top 3 I’d say these guys came first. iPhone app that they demonstrated was a bit buggy and wasn’t as sleak as it could have been but it was still a work in progress and I’d say they were on the verge of getting far enough. People bought up legal issues with racing around M25 etc. My GPS says I’ll be home in 27 minutes and I always try and get home faster, so I don’t see this as a major issue. Yes some idiot will start recording their fastest time doing something illegal but downloading an iPhone app is hardly anonymous so you’d be foolish. Unfortunately I just don’t really see why you would want to race some random person around the place – but please see my note at the end re social media. I believe they are trying to make this work so it will be interesting how it goes.

TaskDoer –Initially I thought this was somewhat of interest. Unfortunately again I don’t think they got far enough. Their competitor analysis highlighted loads, but none of them were real competitors as they seemed to be aiming for an untapped market. eLance and the like do not provide people that will find an insurance quote for you, or a nice restaurant to take your wife too. I had trouble thinking how they could solve this problem. It would appear they had trouble working it out too, as did the final audience. I have not heard if they are going to continue.

Protected.cc – This was my and everyone else’s winner of the weekend. I don’t think they had anything too technically difficult to solve, but they managed to solve it. They had a pretty much fully working product (for some reason Mike Butcher missed this point – but I know he does tend to be busy whilst at conferences, and unless you say it is finished and has 5,000 users it is hard to get him to look up – he admits this openly). I also really like the way they had decided to focus on a niche. I’d always had an issue that if this was general you’d spend your entire life in court as a witness claiming your product was secure. By choosing to focus on the design community they may have reduced this problem as the two parties will know each other and this level of proof could stop things getting near court – depends how much the idea someone has ripped off is worth. I don’t know if they have any chance of ever making any money, but to me they achieved what all Launch48 teams should set out to achieve. It appears they are certainly going to try and take the idea forward (Sherene must have sent about 500 tweets about it!).

Given.org – I buy quite a few domains, and manage to sell the odd one. People often tell me that domains are dead, you don’t need a short domain to succeed etc. The reaction of people to this domain for this product tells me that those people are talking through their arse. We got a lot of extra attention purely because of the domain. Taking that out of the equation I rank our team as second in terms of delivering something of interest. All the parts didn’t quite add up, Paypal isn’t integrated yet – but we had something that gives us momentum going forward. In the whole weekend I was never 100% behind the idea itself, there were a few non-technical issues that were really nagging me, but when I got home into some peace and quiet I think I managed to come up with a solution for most of our problems. I’m not going to detail it here as I haven’t talked with our team about it, but we meet next week and I’m sure we will have something to present in December. Our pitch was helped by having Lucian and Sam present, two young guys that love being the center of attention. We had a website and a facebook app. We had a marketing plan and we had answers for questions. It is still a long path to delivery for us, but I suspect a small group will take it somewhere. Will I be in that group? I don’t know. We had a lot of strong personalities and if all those personalities want to go forward it wont work, so I’d step back. If just one or two want to go forward? Watch out world, because I think we might have something that works.

And Finally

A few last thoughts, things I probably should have mentioned earlier.

I learnt a lot about social media and how young people like it. Oddly there were times when they convinced me of something and an hour later I was trying to sell their idea back to them because they no longer agreed. We had 20 year olds who had 1,000 friends on Facebook. I’ve always been fairly social but in my 37 years I’ve not met 1,000 people I want to be friends with on Facebook. I guess they have a different definition of friend, but I don’t quite understand how Facebook can be much use when you have that many friends in your feed, I struggle keeping up with my 100 or so.

I think two things they could add to the Friday event next time are a talk on Project Management, and a very frank talk on getting the bare minimum out the door so you have a working product (ie no scaling, no unit testing etc).

Apologies again to anyone I may have insulted, especially if your team was short on developers etc (although you could have expressed that in the board meetings). I haven't proof read what I wrote and I finished at 2am so sorry if it doesn't make sense or is a bit harsh.

Now if you are asking yourself who is this opinionated arse, I’m no one. I’ve purely written this to provide an honest appraisal of what I saw, with the hope that it will make the next event even better than this one- hopefully someone will want me in their team!! However I don’t think I’ve written one thing here that at least one other person didn’t express to me as well, so hopefully I’ve managed to provide some feedback that we can all learn from. I learnt a massive amount at the event, and also from analysing my thoughts to write these posts.

See you in January /February at the next event.

Comments [3]

Launch48 - The Build

Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:1; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} .MsoPapDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; margin-bottom:10.0pt; line-height:115%;} @page Section1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} -->

So now onto part three of my review of the Launch48 conference – “The Build”. You can read the first two parts here and here.

Before I do anything I am going to detail the lessons learnt from my perspective. Some of these are personal things that you might want to think about if you are going to join in next time, some are things the organisers might want to think about. Some of these were certainly "knowns" in our groups case.

1. Project Plan / Task List - there really was a diverse range of people in the groups. I doubt few people have ever had any experience at trying to put together such a complex project in 48 hours, and few involved have probably never tried to manage an entire project of any sort. I think in the future if the organisers could provide a task template that covered all the standard things it would be very useful. I don’t think we missed anything, but we definitely duplicated a lot of work.


2. Each team should appoint a project manager. This is not a "CEO", this person reports to the "CEO". Experience helps but it is plausible someone organised could learn the role - Launch48 is not about doing your day job, but about learning something. Obviously the whole thing is at the mercy of time available, but keeping track of what everyone is upto, get estimates of completion time, setting targets is good. This role (and all roles) should be decided Friday night.


3. If you are presenting an idea have a name and some direction for it - maybe even the domain name. We were a bit lucky in that I owned the domain www.given.org and it perfectly fitted our purpose when we started the discussion on Saturday morning, but I would hazard a guess some teams spent ages thinking and changing names. I think wraply was the only name set in stone. A one page summary pre event on the idea would have helped too - it also may have reduced the number of pitches. Once you get going it is hard to get a word in edgeways so if you have something written down it would be great.


4. Printer(s) - access to a printer would have been great. I don't know if Paypal can provide, they do a lot already. I don't think anyone needs to print reams of paper but the ability to print a few pages at times would have been useful. Next time I might buy and bring a £30 inkjet for my team at least. A cheap laser on a bench in the middle that we could have taken turns plugging into would have been fine (setting up a print server might be going a bit far).


5. Technology - in all fairness this is a bit hard to control as you don't know which skills will be in a team, but if possible avoid introducing new tech. Websites are easy, if done in something you know. IPhone and Facebook on Amazon AWS not so easy. It was 6pm Saturday before we had our first line of code written. We had a great team and maybe got a bit lucky - it would have been easy to have been in a position of having nothing to present. This is not the event to extend your ASP.NET knowledge to MVC, not the weekend to learn PHP, Rails etc. I mean it is a free country, you can do what you like, but where as I think someone can try and be a marketer or a project manager over the weekend it would be a rare individual that could learn to program.

6. You don’t have to love the idea – this is a learning weekend. I can’t say I 100% fully supported our idea, in fact I was more like 60%, but I doubt anyone would debate I put a huge amount of energy into getting it done. I may have spread a bit of negativity at times, that is something I have to work on. What was really disappointing was the people that didn’t turn up on Saturday, just because your idea didn’t get accepted on Friday I don’t think that means you quit then. Also a word of advice, if you have a bright hair colour or an unusual hair cut people are going to particularly notice you skipped out early – if you turn up next time with the next Twitter don’t expect to have many team members.

7. Know yourself and gauge your team. I’m pretty good at standing up for myself and my ideas. My team had 5 or 6 people who also had strong ideas and were willing to express them. Some teams seemed more placid. Don’t choose to go into the team with the loudest person in the room if you are quiet- you won’t get heard. At the same time if you are a more forceful personality you need to try and work on stepping back and listening to others sometimes. We had a couple of people in our team that I have since found out are VERY successful in the real world. I wish I had managed to get more out of them because I am sure they had more to offer, but I no doubt talked over them.

8. Developers – if you are a developer and want to develop at Launch48 don’t expect to do too much else. It appears there was a lack of developers (and designers) and whilst I managed to avoid it the others in our team didn’t move all weekend – I’m not even sure they went to the toilet (at times they seemed superhuman, maybe they don’t need a toilet).  If you don’t wish to develop I’d tell people you do something else for a living.

The Build

So building a product for Launch48 is not just about tech. You need to do a presentation, and in that you need to present the product, a marketing plan, a PR strategy, financials and how you are going to make your first billion. We split into various teams to achieve this. I’m not going to write loads here because this post is getting very long, and most of what we did was fairly obvious.

Because of our product it took a long time to get to a point of writing real code and that gave the rest of the team time to start thinking about what the product needed to do, how it needed to be marketed etc. Unfortunately because a lot of people don’t come from a technical background I think it is hard to gauge where things need to go without seeing things on the screen. If possible I would suggest getting something up on the screen that can be modified in an agile way as quickly as possible.  Developers don’t want to rewrite every line of code though, so careful with that one.

It was a very long day, we started about 9.30, had an hour lunch at 2 and left paypal at about 9.30 (and then went to pub until 11.30). But boy did we get some work done. We basically had all of the material for the presentation, an Amazon AWS server setup, the basics of a Facebook app, the domain configured to point to our website (beware that Paypals DNS updates overnight – try and avoid going to your domain until it points to the right place). We’d had a million small arguments about a million small things, but I think generally we were at a consensus. There was loads to do still but there was a light at the end of the tunnel.

Sunday we all got in fairly early and work continued. We pretty much had the content for the presentation so some of the team started putting that together. The “sales” website went forward in leaps and bounds, and the guys made amazing progress on the Facebook app. A few of us tried to work on some copy – I tried to capture what people wanted. It was a slightly more frustrating day, as we got closer to the deadline people got more stressed, tempers got a bit more frayed, a couple of people got a bit disenchanted for while. It was difficult to drag people away from what they were doing, and whilst we had Lucian with the ideas and Paul and William doing a lot of the management of where people were going, we had never truly appointed a CEO. We probably could have done with dragging everyone into our room every two hours or so and had a bit of a “rah rah” session, kept everyone excited and made sure everyone was aware of how well things were going.

We had more than enough strong personalities in our group so it was certainly an interesting afternoon, but come 4pm (ish) we had a cracking presentation and a great prototype to present.

I could keep on typing but I’m at 1,500 words and most of you probably aren’t still reading. Stay tuned for the final part “The Final Presentations” which I hope to post at lunchtime tomorrow.

Comments [3]

Launch 48 - Day 1 - The Pitches

Welcome to part two of my review of the October 2009 Launch48 weekend (first part here: http://dirtyandy.posterous.com/launch48-day-1-summary). I realised I forgot to link to the Launch48 site in the first post, so here you go: http://www.launch48.com - good domain name!

So we had an hour between the end of the conference part and the start of the pitching and I whipped up the road for dinner with two new friends - this event was really good for networking, I exchanged business cards and contact details with a lot of people. When we got back they were getting ready to start the pitches and once we sat down I found out you were supposed to have registered your name on a list if you wanted to pitch. They said there would be time for a couple more at the end but they ran out of time and had two or three people that weren't allowed to pitch. I had two different ideas that I was interested in pitching, but more had them there in case they were desperately short of ideas. There had also been an area on the supporting website where you could post pitch ideas, but unfortunately not many people actually signed up until last minute so this was a bit quiet. Definitely another area of improvement would be to ensure everyone knew they had to get their name on the list to pitch.

So the pitching began. There were 30 pitches in total, each person got one minute in which to present their idea, and I did actually write a note and keep a count of votes for each one, but I cannot find the piece of paper. If I find it later I will try and detail them out. There were some great pitches for some awful ideas, there were some awful pitches for some possibly great ideas. There was one girl who may have said she had solved the worlds energy problems and if we could get a website up by Sunday night we'd all be billionaires on Monday. Sadly I couldn't hear a word she said so I am not sure if that is what she was promising or not. A microphone at this point would be great, and I know it is nerve racking to stand up in front of a crowd and talk, but once you have gotten that far you might as well at least project your voice and a bit of confidence. After everyone had pitched the organisers went through each one and gathered a show of hands from the audience.

This then took it through to 12 ideas, they had two minutes to further their pitch and take a question or two. I recorded each idea, a rough idea of number of votes and whether I would be remotely interested in joining their team. I had a no, maybe and yes column and no one made it to the yes column. It doesn't mean they were bad ideas but from the initial pitches I was pretty sure none of them would create a viable business that I would be overly interested in being involved in. Idea, Market and Business Model were part of the requirements for pitching.

The List (I know I haven't gotten their initial product names right - but close enough)

 

Idea  Votes      My Interest Reason
Find a Driving Instructor Low No Idea didn't appeal
Facebook Corporate Giving Medium Maybe Idea from Lucian - I knew of him via stuff on Techcrunch and figured he would make it interesting. Idea was quite interesting although a massive number of issues in front of it.
Socialise Medium Maybe Idea from Sam - didn't know of him but he had some energy and I figured like above. Didn't keep enough notes about it but thought it was of interest
Old Folks Home Finder Low No Not necessarily a bad idea although in Q&A someone pointed out that it is well covered by another company - but a bit boring
Wraply - a gift giving service High No I actually think a good idea, 3 people had similar and I had the idea about 3 years ago, actually bought the domain chipin.co.uk. The guy that presented this was also likely to be the best of the three with this idea, but as I had also thought about this area a bit I thought 4 people with strongly formed ideas might be a bit much
Clothes Fitting Low Maybe This was my closest to a yes and after he pitched I realised a way that may have really made it work. I almost definitely would have wanted to work on this team if it had gone through. I never buy clothes online because sizes are such a pain. I meant to have a chat with the guy behind this later and never managed - if he happens to read this and wants to get in touch I'd love to have a chat
Wine Finder High No One of my two ideas to pitch was a Beer Finder. I think that is an easier domain to work in. There are thousands of wine producers producing dozens of wines, and these guys were hoping to be able to create an app where you could have a wine in a restaurant and then type in the barcode or scan it and get links to it etc. Drinking wine is a hobby of mine. Most wine in restaurants does not have barcodes. Half the French wines you are doing well if you can even read the label. I just didn't see anyway this could work
Loyalty Card Point Swap High No Really interesting idea but I felt it had too many legal and contractual issues to work through in the weekend,  let alone develop a website to support it
PA Finder Medium Maybe This was to be a Virtual Assistant / PA finder. The main reason I was interested in this is that half the people that follow me on Twitter are VA/PA's. It doesn't mean there is an increasing market but there is definitely an increasing number of resources around.
Yet Another Gift Thing Medium No Wraply seemed to have a slightly better idea leader so I think most people voted for him instead. The three pitching this idea said they would all join up anyway
Verify High Maybe A bit like I had an idea like Wraply I also had an idea identical to this one - about three years back. The reason I never pursued it was I didn't think it was legally enforceable. More on this in my final wrap up. It was slightly of interest to be involved in but I felt that because I had thoughts on the idea already it was better not to - plus it is pretty boring and corporatey and that is what I do in a day job
Amazing iPhone Race High Maybe Interesting idea, was worried about a lack of iPhone developers but was quite interested in being involved in an iPhone app. I think so was everyone else.


So who went through?

  • Facebook Corporate Giving
  • Wraply
  • Wine Finder
  • PA Finder
  • Verify
  • Amazing iPhone Race


Now I wasn't on the official counting party or anything but I am sure they got this wrong. The Loyalty Card Point Swap should have gone through, and probably the Facebook Corporate Giving application shouldn't have, although it was close between that and the PA Finder.

If it had been my choice I would have gone with the clothes app, but that didn't get through. I sat and thought some of these ideas were very easy to implement, the leaders seemed easy going, perhaps the marketing would need some thought but that was about it. The contract I am doing at the moment is good (I have to say that, they might read this) but it is far from challenging - we are on a phase of work that is very boring. I didn't want to spend my weekend working on something boring, so I chose the Facebook Corporate Giving app. Why? Well it needed a Facebook app, a normal website, it had what I viewed as almost insurmountable issues to get through to ever be used by a corporate. I knew of Lucian and happened to follow him on Twitter, he is young, full of energy, very opinionated, one of the reasons for this idea would be it could help a charity he was involved in - there was no doubt he was going to be an extremely challenging individual to work with. So I joined that team.

Joining a team was easy, they all took turns to stand up, and anyone that wanted to join joined. Lucian's turn was last, it would be easy to imagine that resulted in people who really couldn't decide which team to join, but in actual fact I think it resulted in people who really wanted to join the team - we had a great team.

We departed the large conference room and travelled across the hallway to Paypal's dining and meeting room area (they have an awesome setup). Initially we had quite a small team so we nabbed a small padded meeting room and setup shop. We quickly went through who each of us were, what we did, where we could help. We had a small debate about whether to do this as a charity or a business (we were supposed to be creating revenue generating businesses) but decided to leave that decision until later. We had three developers and a designer so that made me feel good about the technical part of the site. We had a few marketers, a few students, a few people with some vision and a few people with some general running a business experience. I can't say I thought the idea would go far, but I thought we had a pretty good team to try it. A couple of beers and some chatting and we all went home. I got home and took a look at how to develop for Facebook, found out there was a pre built template for using Amazon AWS (Amazon was a sponsor and gave everyone free time in the cloud) with Facebook and called it a night.

My next post will be about the process we went through to get to the final pitch, and I'll follow that with some analysis of what everyone produced.


Comments [2]

Launch48 - Day 1 Summary

Well this is my first ever blog post, and it is partially written standing up on the tube so if it is rubbish I blame that. I’ve just spent the weekend at Launch48 - a weekend that got a variety (and when I say a variety I really mean a variety as I will detail later) of people together to attempt to build a web app.

To kick things off they held a one day conference at the Paypal offices in Richmond, West London. In this blog post I intend to detail the conference part and I'll do another post or two to cover the rest of the weekend where we split into teams and built an app.

Before I continue let me just say I am very blunt - if I don't like it I'm not going to sugar coat it. I didn't meet anyone I didn't like - so please don't take anything too personally - but people who are too positive about really crap ideas piss me off, so I make sure I am not one of them.

Also let me say that whilst I pass out some criticism here I am only doing it for the areas that need improvement because I think it is worth it - I'll be the first one to buy a ticket for the next event - it was brilliant.

So the conference got started around 10am. Adil, Ian and the others (there was one other main guy up the front and I embarrassed to say I’ve forgotten his name) did an amazing job organising it but there were a few things they could have done to improve it. Firstly there were way too many chairs, they probably shouldn't have had so many out in the first place, but they definitely should have asked everyone to condense up a bit once it became obvious they had too many. I sat at the back so I'm as guilty as anyone, but these things work better and there is more energy when people are packed like sardines. While I'm being negative I'll keep being negative but there are loads of positives so keep reading. Unfortunately I think Adil and Ian are probably a bit geeky like me, our types aren't really the types to get an audience going, they really needed an MC of some sort. There were no "are we all having fun?"s, there was no turn around and introduce yourself to someone you don't know etc. It made it all a bit flat. I went to Techcrunch's Geek & Rolla earlier in the year and I would say that is how you want to run a conference. There also seemed to be a lack of a microphone. It wasn't the biggest space but it was a bit hard to hear some of the speakers (and certainly the pitchers later on). The microphones did appear come Sunday night.

So onto the speakers (and this is where I get positive). I don't know how the guys got these speakers, tickets for the event were cheap so they weren't paying them, but they were bloody brilliant. It started with a sports guy (Dr Dorian Dugmore), I've spent the year training for a couple of triathlons and it has made an amazing difference to my entire life so he was particularly relevant for me. He perhaps went on a bit long and some people may not have been that interested in their health but he was an excellent speaker about an interesting topic.

From there we got into more startup related talks. Next up was Bill Morrow from Angels Den (one of those pay to pitch type groups that Jason Calacanis is having a go at currently). Very smart guy who had some good advice on creating a business investors might be interested in. He was followed by Danvers Baillieu – one half of the Danvers and Barry show, if you haven’t met these guys they are absolutely classic – funny, nice guys and really into helping start-ups – you almost forget they are lawyers! Danvers gave lots of good advice on legal aspects to think about when starting a company, and some great on advice on a few issues to try and not worry about until you need too. I work on a real basis of “a nice problem to have” because that generally means you are finally having some success and some of his talk was along those lines. He also had a great slide pack, you can find it online. I'm definitely going to have to get along to one of their Bootlaw sessions sometime soon.

I’m just looking at how many more talks there were (8) and thinking I don’t quite have the energy to summarise them here, but one talk (which I also heard at Geek n Rolla) was from Reshma Sohoni from Seedcamp. She is a great speaker and did a brilliant summary of different revenue models for web apps, if you ever get a chance to hear her talk do so. All of the other speakers were very good, I think slide packs are available online for some and they are worth a look.

Now one key thing I did pick up on was the variety in the audience. The conference was sold as a web app building conference and I was amazed at the number of people who do not come from a technology background (they were very interested though, they hadn't just gone to the wrong conference). I met several people who had never even heard of Techcrunch. Personally I thought this was brilliant. I feel the start-up community is a bit too into itself and getting people from more conventional businesses involved is great. There were CFO’s, Management Consultants and loads of others. For these people the conference must have been absolutely fantastic as it gave such a great guide as to how technology start-ups get going. Which also brings me to my final criticism – I didn’t really learn anything. I spend way too much time reading about stuff, watching presentations from other conferences etc. I said at the top that I’d be back next time, I definitely will be for the overall weekend, if they do another day session I may think twice. Saying that I met some great people during that first day, and I may well think of going again just for the networking.

The first day was finished with “Launch48 Lessons Learnt” from last time and a panel discussion. The panel discussion was a bit light weight but people were getting a bit tired by then anyway. The two Lessons Learnt talks from the last Launch48 were brilliant. Very honest analysis of where they went right and wrong by two guys that I think most people probably wished were available to work in teams rather than just mentor over the weekend.

 And that is the end of my analysis of the conference part of the event. Hopefully I might get a post about the pitching process out tonight, and I will attempt to do a post about creating the project, and end with my analysis of the six projects that got created.

I hope this has been of interest to someone.

 

PS. A quick edit - I've named Adil and Ian at the top of this but there was loads of people who made the event happen - thanks to all of them

 

Comments [1]